G
|
oing
by the crowds in the malls and the multiplexes, the rising inflation, appears
to have no effect on the affluent and the neo-rich. There could have been a
dent in their investments but their day-today life seems to be least affected. But it’s a body blow to the majority who
struggles to make ends meet on a daily basis.
This
clearly shows the lopsided development of our society. No wonder that a report states that India,
that ranks fourth in the world’s list of dollar billionaires, ranks 126th
in the human development. The root cause
of the problem is the stark disparity in the income levels.
When
Prime Minister Manamohan Singh expressed concern over this alarming trend,
there was a large hue and cry. His statement drew flak especially from those
whose income is in the upper bracket. Unfortunately, those who ought to have
elated were not even aware of his statement.
As the
private sectors do not have a set guideline, the executives at the higher
echelon try to extricate as more as possible while the staff at the other end of the
spectrum are dolled out as little as possible. The high emolument is to placate
and retain the limited talents. Those
who do menial jobs are always left with “fair” wages as in their case the
supply outstrips the demand.
Agriculture,
nowadays, has turned out to be nothing but a gamble. The situation being like this, there is a
steady increase in the neo- rich, so is a rapid increase in the number of poor.
Such
lopsided development is, in fact, a dangerous trend. This breeds animosity
between the classes. The poor could not afford to lead a decent life as all
their needs go out of reach. The needle of blame for the deplorable plight of
the poor tends to point at the rich.
How else
one can interpret an incident in Bangalore in the recent past? A group of four
techies was attacked but without being looted of their money or valuables. It
shows the hatred the average
Bangaloreans harbour against those people who made the city, a home for them
for years, unaffordable. On the other hand the rich generally are
apathetic towards the problems of the thousands of the poor around them.
Development
has to be inclusive. It should not create a vast wedge between the classes.
Difference between economic classes is natural, but it should not be so wide
that the one class ending up with all the pleasures of life leaving the people
at other end to struggle for survival.
(The article was published in Open Page section of The Hindu)
No comments:
Post a Comment